I found this strange behaviour when testing arrays with infinite type.
This works good:
In [91]: np.testing.assert_array_less(5, 6)
In [92]: np.testing.assert_array_less(5, np.array([6]))
In [93]: 5 < np.inf
Out[93]: True
but when using numpy testing module it occurs that 5 is not less than inf:
In [94]: np.testing.assert_array_less(5, np.array([np.inf]))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssertionError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-93-c43a15aa8a1a> in <module>()
----> 1 np.testing.assert_array_less(5, np.array([np.inf]))
c:\python27\lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.pyc in assert_array_less(x, y, err_msg, verbose)
911 assert_array_compare(operator.__lt__, x, y, err_msg=err_msg,
912 verbose=verbose,
--> 913 header='Arrays are not less-ordered')
914
915 def runstring(astr, dict):
c:\python27\lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.pyc in assert_array_compare(comparison, x, y, err_msg, verbose, header, precision)
629 if any(x_isinf) or any(y_isinf):
630 # Check +inf and -inf separately, since they are different
--> 631 chk_same_position(x == +inf, y == +inf, hasval='+inf')
632 chk_same_position(x == -inf, y == -inf, hasval='-inf')
633
c:\python27\lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.pyc in chk_same_position(x_id, y_id, hasval)
606 % (hasval), verbose=verbose, header=header,
607 names=('x', 'y'), precision=precision)
--> 608 raise AssertionError(msg)
609
610 try:
AssertionError:
Arrays are not less-ordered
x and y +inf location mismatch:
x: array(5)
y: array([ inf])
Why numpy checks if infs are on the same positions? Is it desired behaviour?
In [99]: np.__version__
Out[99]: '1.9.3'
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire