Javascript (actually Typescript) project where tests are written with enzyme. We have 1000+ tests and shallow is not used only once --we always use mount.
Tests are starting to take longer to run, and I know that a good amount of our tests do no require to mount the component. shallow would suffice. In this scenario I ask myself: is it worth to use shallow whenever possible to reduce the amount of time that tests need to run?
I have been looking around, trying to find a quantitative comparison between mount and shallow but have been unable to find such a thing. In other words: if my best scenario is to save 1% of time I will not spend time on this. But if I can speed up my tests by, say, a 20%, then I will probably want to do it.
Do you have any insight into this topic, or know about any quantification on this topic?
TL;DR: I know the difference between mount and shallow. I know that shallow is faster than mount. The question is how much faster is shallow in comparison to mount (depends on many things... I am talking about some estimates)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire