I'm trying to test how my App responds to different AVFoundation configurations. I'm using the techniques described in the WWDC video 'Engineering for Testability.'
I created a protocol to represent the pieces of an AVCaptureDevice
that my app uses.
public protocol AVCaptureDeviceProperties: class {
//MARK: Properties I use and need to test
var position: AVCaptureDevice.Position { get }
var focusMode: AVCaptureDevice.FocusMode { get set }
var exposureMode: AVCaptureDevice.ExposureMode { get set }
var whiteBalanceMode: AVCaptureDevice.WhiteBalanceMode { get set }
//MARK: Functions I use use and need to test
func lockForConfiguration() throws
func unlockForConfiguration()
func isFocusModeSupported(_ focusMode: AVCaptureDevice.FocusMode) -> Bool
func isExposureModeSupported(_ exposureMode: AVCaptureDevice.ExposureMode) -> Bool
func isWhiteBalanceModeSupported(_ whiteBalanceMode: AVCaptureDevice.WhiteBalanceMode) -> Bool
}
I have an extension that makes AVCaptureDevice
conform to my protocol.
extension AVCaptureDevice: AVCaptureDeviceProperties {
//Don't need anything because AVCaptureDevice already has implementations of all the properties and functions I use.
}
I can now make an object for myself where I can configure all the properties for different test cases. Works great!
However, I need to take it another step further and get a mock AVCaptureDeviceInput
object. This object only has one initializer that takes a AVCaptureDevice
but I want to be able to mock initialize with my protocol type. So far I have this:
extension AVCaptureDeviceInput {
convenience init?(device: AVCaptureDeviceProperties) throws {
guard let downcast = device as? AVCaptureDevice else {
return nil
}
try self.init(device: downcast)
}
}
However, I will never get a successful initialization with a mock object that conforms to my protocol. How to I solve this problem so I can test?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire